Category
•
November 3, 2026

ABL Case Study: Tricolor Holdings

Author:
Mike Shum
ABL Case Study: Tricolor Holdings

Why this case matters

Tricolor collapsed in September 2025, the same month as First Brands Group. The two cases share a pattern that should concern every asset-based lender: the alleged fraud did not depend on sophisticated forgery. It depended on lenders accepting borrower-prepared data at face value, reviewing it on a sample basis, and seeing only their own slice of a crowded financing stack.

According to the indictment and a later SEC complaint, executives manually edited delinquency fields in borrowing base spreadsheets, pledged the same loans to multiple warehouses, kept sold cars on an inventory line, and recycled charged-off loans with fake payments. The evidence sat in reports lenders received several times a week. When a junior lender finally checked whether “current” loans were actually paying down, the scheme unraveled within weeks.

SUMMARY: Fraud methods at a glance

Two primary mechanisms, double-pledging and loan data manipulation, were supported by techniques to sustain and conceal them. Select a method to jump to its section.

‍

Category
8 min read

ABL Case Study: Tricolor Holdings

How roughly $800 million of nonexistent collateral moved through a subprime auto lender’s financing stack, and the data checks that would have exposed it.
Written by
Mike Shum
Published on
November 3, 2026

Why this case matters

Tricolor collapsed in September 2025, the same month as First Brands Group. The two cases share a pattern that should concern every asset-based lender: the alleged fraud did not depend on sophisticated forgery. It depended on lenders accepting borrower-prepared data at face value, reviewing it on a sample basis, and seeing only their own slice of a crowded financing stack.

According to the indictment and a later SEC complaint, executives manually edited delinquency fields in borrowing base spreadsheets, pledged the same loans to multiple warehouses, kept sold cars on an inventory line, and recycled charged-off loans with fake payments. The evidence sat in reports lenders received several times a week. When a junior lender finally checked whether “current” loans were actually paying down, the scheme unraveled within weeks.

SUMMARY: Fraud methods at a glance

Two primary mechanisms, double-pledging and loan data manipulation, were supported by techniques to sustain and conceal them. Select a method to jump to its section.

‍

Stay Connected
No spam. Just the latest releases and tips, interesting articles, and exclusive interviews in your inbox every week.

Related Posts

Which Analytics Tools Support Due Diligence in Asset-Based Lending?

Due diligence in asset-based lending isn't one exercise. It's five or six of them running at once.
September 24, 2026
Mike Shum

Mapping Private Credit Funds in the United States 2026

The US private credit market continues to grow in depth and complexity—fueled by demand from both asset originators seeking flexible capital and investors
September 17, 2026
Parham Mofidi

7 Private Credit Risk Software Capabilities for Lenders

Lenders managing private credit portfolios face a specific operational challenge: scaling monitoring and risk analytics
August 18, 2026