Category
July 22, 2025

How Tiny Data Errors Create $1 Million Phantom Borrowing Bases in Asset-Backed Lending

Author:
Kyle Meade
How Tiny Data Errors Create $1 Million Phantom Borrowing Bases in Asset-Backed Lending

In the highly complex and data-driven world of asset-backed loans (ABL), even the smallest errors can lead to massive overstatements of collateral—sometimes exceeding a million dollars. These "phantom" borrowing bases can distort risk assessments and lead to unintended exposures, all stemming from tiny data discrepancies.

The Importance of Relying on Third-Party Data Calculations


Most service providers, whether treasury management firms or loan administrators, do not perform the core calculations themselves. Instead, they depend on third-party data providers and automated systems to supply the critical figures: the outstanding principal balance of receivables and the days past due (DPD). Given the sheer volume of daily data—transactions, reversals, updates—manual validation is practically impossible. That’s why specialized data companies are essential, using sophisticated validation processes to maintain accuracy.

Why Small Errors Are So Dangerous
With thousands or millions of data points flowing daily, tiny inaccuracies can slip through unnoticed. Over time, these discrepancies can compound, creating seriously inflated collateral values that aren’t rooted in reality. And in large, long-term facilities, these small errors can go undetected for months or even years.

A Real-World Example: The $1 Million Phantom Borrowing Base

Consider a facility that operated for over a year, generating more than 15 gigabytes of raw data files. Every day, the originator sent two files to the lender:

  1. The Loan File, listing balances and DPDs.
  1. The Transaction File, detailing all payments and reversals.

The automated system that produced these files had a subtle flaw:  

  • Normal payments of $100—split into $90 principal and $10 interest—reduced the outstanding balance correctly.
  • When a payment was declined, a reversal transaction was supposed to correct this.

However, instead of reversing the split, the system mistakenly inserted the full $100 into principal during the reversal. This incorrect entry increased the outstanding balance by $100, and because the reversal didn't properly split the payment, an extra $10 of principal remained unadjusted.

Over thousands of transactions, these small errors accumulated. After over a year and countless files, the false collateral value—based on these inflated balances—surpassed $1 million. Neither the lender nor the originator recognized the discrepancy until a thorough reconciliation uncovered the error.

The Lesson

This example underscores the critical need for dedicated data validation and reconciliation services. Relying on manual checks or simple pivot tables isn’t enough to catch systemic errors in large, complex data sets. Automated validation tools like Cascade can identify these discrepancies immediately, making errors obvious before they grow into significant financial risks.

The bottom line: Tiny data errors can create massive, hidden risks. Employing advanced validation systems is essential to ensure data integrity and prevent phantom collateral from slipping through unnoticed.

Don’t let tiny data errors inflate your borrowing base. See how Cascade’s automated validation tools catch discrepancies before they cost you millions.

Category
8 min read

How Tiny Data Errors Create $1 Million Phantom Borrowing Bases in Asset-Backed Lending

In the highly complex and data-driven world of asset-backed loans (ABL), even the smallest errors can lead to massive overstatements of collateral.
Written by
Kyle Meade
Published on
July 22, 2025

In the highly complex and data-driven world of asset-backed loans (ABL), even the smallest errors can lead to massive overstatements of collateral—sometimes exceeding a million dollars. These "phantom" borrowing bases can distort risk assessments and lead to unintended exposures, all stemming from tiny data discrepancies.

The Importance of Relying on Third-Party Data Calculations


Most service providers, whether treasury management firms or loan administrators, do not perform the core calculations themselves. Instead, they depend on third-party data providers and automated systems to supply the critical figures: the outstanding principal balance of receivables and the days past due (DPD). Given the sheer volume of daily data—transactions, reversals, updates—manual validation is practically impossible. That’s why specialized data companies are essential, using sophisticated validation processes to maintain accuracy.

Why Small Errors Are So Dangerous
With thousands or millions of data points flowing daily, tiny inaccuracies can slip through unnoticed. Over time, these discrepancies can compound, creating seriously inflated collateral values that aren’t rooted in reality. And in large, long-term facilities, these small errors can go undetected for months or even years.

A Real-World Example: The $1 Million Phantom Borrowing Base

Consider a facility that operated for over a year, generating more than 15 gigabytes of raw data files. Every day, the originator sent two files to the lender:

  1. The Loan File, listing balances and DPDs.
  1. The Transaction File, detailing all payments and reversals.

The automated system that produced these files had a subtle flaw:  

  • Normal payments of $100—split into $90 principal and $10 interest—reduced the outstanding balance correctly.
  • When a payment was declined, a reversal transaction was supposed to correct this.

However, instead of reversing the split, the system mistakenly inserted the full $100 into principal during the reversal. This incorrect entry increased the outstanding balance by $100, and because the reversal didn't properly split the payment, an extra $10 of principal remained unadjusted.

Over thousands of transactions, these small errors accumulated. After over a year and countless files, the false collateral value—based on these inflated balances—surpassed $1 million. Neither the lender nor the originator recognized the discrepancy until a thorough reconciliation uncovered the error.

The Lesson

This example underscores the critical need for dedicated data validation and reconciliation services. Relying on manual checks or simple pivot tables isn’t enough to catch systemic errors in large, complex data sets. Automated validation tools like Cascade can identify these discrepancies immediately, making errors obvious before they grow into significant financial risks.

The bottom line: Tiny data errors can create massive, hidden risks. Employing advanced validation systems is essential to ensure data integrity and prevent phantom collateral from slipping through unnoticed.

Don’t let tiny data errors inflate your borrowing base. See how Cascade’s automated validation tools catch discrepancies before they cost you millions.

Stay Connected
No spam. Just the latest releases and tips, interesting articles, and exclusive interviews in your inbox every week.

Related Posts

Irindu Seneviratne

Why Investors Trust Originators’ Calculations

Trust in financial data isn’t just earned, it’s built.
July 11, 2025
Mike Shum

Most Active Private Credit Investors in LATAM | Inversionistas de Crédito Privado más activos en LATAM

Latin America's startup scene is booming, and venture debt funds are fueling the fire. Find out which private credit investors are funding the region.
May 7, 2025
Mike Shum

Private Debt and Alternative Credit Investors in the United States

The US private credit market continues to grow in depth and complexity—fueled by demand from both asset originators seeking flexible capital and investors
April 24, 2025